WebTransport: expose outgoing datagram queue capacity per session by jesup · Pull Request #4037 · mozilla/neqo

jesup · 2026-10-03T03:08:40Z

No description provided.

jesup · 2026-10-03T03:08:48Z

This PR is part of a stack of 4 bookmarks:

trunk()
users/jesup/report_datagrams
users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity ← this PR
users/jesup/add_remote_max_streams
users/jesup/anticipated_incoming_streams

Created with jj-stack

Copilot

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

No blocking issues remain, and the trait change is consistent with the documented compatibility policy for main.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Exposes per-session outgoing datagram queue capacity through the WebTransport client API.

Changes:

Adds a capacity accessor with WebTransport session validation.
Preserves outgoing datagram statistics during session cleanup.
Tests queue isolation, invalid session IDs, and cleanup accounting.

File	Description
neqo-http3/tests/connect_udp.rs	Tests rejection of CONNECT-UDP sessions.
neqo-http3/src/webtransport.rs	Exposes the client capacity accessor.
neqo-http3/src/features/extended_connect/tests/webtransport/datagrams.rs	Tests capacity isolation and cleanup statistics.
neqo-http3/src/features/extended_connect/session.rs	Makes the capacity helper available outside tests.
neqo-http3/src/connection.rs	Validates capacity requests and records cleanup statistics.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

codecov · 2026-10-03T03:13:25Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.00%. Comparing base (6325866) to head (4c6d5b8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                      Coverage Diff                      @@
##           users/jesup/report_datagrams    #4037   +/-   ##
=============================================================
  Coverage                         97.00%   97.00%           
=============================================================
  Files                               118      118           
  Lines                             41878    41883    +5     
  Branches                          41878    41883    +5     
=============================================================
+ Hits                              40625    40630    +5     
  Misses                             1227     1227           
  Partials                             26       26

Flag	Coverage Δ
freebsd	`94.60% <100.00%> (+16.05%)`	⬆️
linux	`97.20% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
macos	`95.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)`	⬆️
windows	`95.46% <100.00%> (-0.02%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
neqo-common	`99.31% <ø> (ø)`
neqo-http3	`95.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
neqo-qpack	`97.10% <ø> (ø)`
neqo-transport	`97.99% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
neqo-udp	`95.37% <ø> (ø)`
mtu	`89.13% <ø> (ø)`

codspeed · 2026-10-03T03:31:52Z

Merging this PR will regress 2 benchmarks

⚡ 7 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 92 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	WallTime	`quiche-neqo`	42 ms	43.6 ms	-3.74%
❌	Simulation	`simulated/pacing-false/same-seed`	74.8 ms	76.5 ms	-2.24%
⚡	WallTime	`1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)`	3 ms	2.9 ms	+3.62%
⚡	WallTime	`1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)`	69.4 ms	67.3 ms	+3.11%
⚡	WallTime	`1-conn/1-100mb-req (aka. Upload)`	49.2 ms	47.9 ms	+2.72%
⚡	WallTime	`walltime/1000-streams/each-1000-bytes`	12.9 ms	12.6 ms	+2.65%
⚡	WallTime	`walltime/pacing-true/varying-seeds`	2 ms	2 ms	+2.37%
⚡	WallTime	`1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)`	49.1 ms	48 ms	+2.33%
⚡	WallTime	`walltime/1000-streams/each-1-bytes`	3.8 ms	3.7 ms	+2.03%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity (4c6d5b8) with users/jesup/report_datagrams (6325866)}

larseggert · 2026-10-15T07:18:27Z

@jesup clippy is unhappy

Add a production-facing Http3Client::webtransport_datagram_queue_capacity, so a caller (e.g. a content-process credit grant) can read a session's outgoing-datagram queue state without going through the test-only path. The underlying transport-level DatagramQueueCapacity snapshot and per-session accessor already existed but were only reachable from #[cfg(test)] code; drop that gate now that there's a real caller.

github-actions · 2026-10-17T17:31:03Z

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server, differences relative to users/jesup/report_datagrams at 6325866.

neqo-pr as client	neqo-pr as server
neqo-pr vs. go-x-net: BP BA neqo-pr vs. haproxy: BP BA neqo-pr vs. kwik: ⚠️DC C20 U A L1 C1 neqo-pr vs. lsquic: L1 C1 neqo-pr vs. msquic: Z A L1 C1 neqo-pr vs. mvfst: A BA neqo-pr vs. neqo: Z A neqo-pr vs. nginx: BP BA neqo-pr vs. ngtcp2: Z 🚀~~L1 C1~~ CM neqo-pr vs. picoquic: Z A 🚀~~BP BA~~ neqo-pr vs. quic-go: A neqo-pr vs. quiche: BP BA neqo-pr vs. s2n-quic: CM neqo-pr vs. tquic: S BP BA neqo-pr vs. xquic: S R Z A L1 C1	go-x-net vs. neqo-pr: 🚀BA CM kwik vs. neqo-pr: BP BA CM linuxquic vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️CM msquic vs. neqo-pr: CM mvfst vs. neqo-pr: Z L1 C1 CM neqo vs. neqo-pr: Z A openssl vs. neqo-pr: LR M A CM quic-go vs. neqo-pr: CM quic-zig vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️C1 CM quiche vs. neqo-pr: CM quinn vs. neqo-pr: V2 CM s2n-quic vs. neqo-pr: 🚀B CM tquic vs. neqo-pr: CM xquic vs. neqo-pr: M CM

All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr vs. aioquic: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. go-x-net: H DC LR M B U A L2 C2 6
neqo-pr vs. haproxy: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2
neqo-pr vs. kwik: H ⚠️DC LR ⚠️C20 M S R Z 3 B ⚠️U A L2 C2 6 V2 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. linuxquic: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A 🚀L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
neqo-pr vs. lsquic: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L2 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
neqo-pr vs. msquic: H DC LR C20 M S R B U L2 C2 6 V2 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. mvfst: H DC LR M R Z 3 B U L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP
neqo-pr vs. neqo: H DC LR C20 M S R 3 B U E L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
neqo-pr vs. nginx: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6
neqo-pr vs. ngtcp2: H DC LR C20 M S R 3 B U E A 🚀L1 L2 🚀C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. picoquic: H DC LR C20 M S R 3 B U E L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 🚀~~BP BA~~ CM
neqo-pr vs. quic-go: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. quic-zig: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
neqo-pr vs. quiche: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6
neqo-pr vs. quinn: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. s2n-quic: H DC LR C20 M S R 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. tquic: H DC LR C20 M R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6
neqo-pr vs. xquic: H DC LR C20 M 3 B U L2 C2 6 BP BA

neqo-pr as server

aioquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
chrome vs. neqo-pr: 3
go-x-net vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR M B U A L2 C2 6 BP 🚀BA
kwik vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2
linuxquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA ⚠️CM
lsquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
msquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA
mvfst vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR M 3 B A L2 C2 6 BP BA
neqo vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R 3 B U E L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
ngtcp2 vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
openssl vs. neqo-pr: H DC C20 S R 3 B L2 C2 6 BP BA
picoquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
quic-go vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
quic-zig vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 ⚠️C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA
quiche vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR M S R Z 3 B A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
quinn vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z 3 B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
s2n-quic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR M S R 3 🚀B E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
tquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR M S R Z 3 B A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA
xquic vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 S R Z 3 B U A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 BP BA

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr vs. aioquic: E CM
neqo-pr vs. go-x-net: C20 S R Z 3 E L1 C1 V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. haproxy: E CM
neqo-pr vs. kwik: E CM
neqo-pr vs. msquic: 3 E CM
neqo-pr vs. mvfst: C20 S E V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. nginx: E V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. quic-go: E V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. quiche: E V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. quinn: V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. s2n-quic: Z V2
neqo-pr vs. tquic: E V2 CM
neqo-pr vs. xquic: E V2 CM

neqo-pr as server

aioquic vs. neqo-pr: E
chrome vs. neqo-pr: H DC LR C20 M S R Z B U E A L1 L2 C1 C2 6 V2 BP BA CM
go-x-net vs. neqo-pr: C20 S R Z 3 E L1 C1 V2
kwik vs. neqo-pr: E
lsquic vs. neqo-pr: U
msquic vs. neqo-pr: 3 E
mvfst vs. neqo-pr: C20 S R U E V2
openssl vs. neqo-pr: Z U E L1 C1 V2
quic-go vs. neqo-pr: E V2
quiche vs. neqo-pr: C20 U E V2
s2n-quic vs. neqo-pr: C20 Z U V2
tquic vs. neqo-pr: C20 U E V2
xquic vs. neqo-pr: E V2

github-actions · 2026-10-17T17:32:08Z

Client/server transfer results

Performance differences relative to 6325866.

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server	Mean±σ	Min–Max	Median±MAD	MiB/s±σ	ΔMedian
google-neqo-cubic	68.8 ± 0.3	67.7 – 69.6	68.8 ± 0.3	465.2 ± 2.2	💔 +0.8 (+1.1%)

Table above only shows statistically significant changes. See all results below.

All results

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server	Mean±σ	Min–Max	Median±MAD	MiB/s±σ	ΔMedian
google-google ⚠️	133.7 ± 0.7	132.8 – 139.6	133.6 ± 0.5	239.3 ± 1.3
google-neqo-cubic	68.8 ± 0.3	67.7 – 69.6	68.8 ± 0.3	465.2 ± 2.2	💔 +0.8 (+1.1%)
neqo-google-cubic	236.7 ± 36.9	181.3 – 477.7	235.1 ± 31.1	135.2 ± 21.1	+6.9 (+3.0%)
neqo-neqo-cubic	19.9 ± 0.1	19.6 – 20.1	19.9 ± 0.2	1610.1 ± 10.6	+0.2 (+1.0%)
neqo-neqo-cubic-nopacing	19.7 ± 0.2	19.4 – 20.5	19.7 ± 0.1	1621.6 ± 13.6	-0.0 (-0.0%)
neqo-neqo-newreno	19.9 ± 0.1	19.6 – 20.2	19.9 ± 0.1	1609.2 ± 11.7	-0.0 (-0.2%)
neqo-neqo-newreno-nopacing	19.5 ± 0.2	19.1 – 19.9	19.5 ± 0.2	1642.9 ± 14.1	+0.1 (+0.3%)
neqo-quiche-cubic	29.5 ± 0.2	29.0 – 30.2	29.5 ± 0.2	1084.0 ± 8.0	-0.2 (-0.6%)
neqo-s2n-cubic	38.1 ± 0.2	37.7 – 38.9	38.1 ± 0.2	839.5 ± 3.8	+0.0 (+0.0%)
quiche-neqo-cubic	31.4 ± 0.4	30.4 – 32.3	31.5 ± 0.4	1018.4 ± 13.2	+0.2 (+0.7%)
quiche-quiche	36.1 ± 0.3	35.4 – 37.2	36.0 ± 0.3	887.5 ± 7.9
s2n-neqo-cubic	117.9 ± 0.5	116.5 – 119.4	117.9 ± 0.4	271.4 ± 1.1	+0.1 (+0.1%)
s2n-s2n ⚠️	165.9 ± 25.1	135.3 – 278.9	160.7 ± 1.2	192.9 ± 29.2

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

github-actions · 2026-10-17T17:40:26Z

Benchmark results

No significant performance differences relative to 6325866.

All results

transfer/1-conn/1-100mb-req (aka. Upload)/mtu-1500

       time:   [50.084 ms 50.110 ms 50.137 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9478 GiB/s 1.9488 GiB/s 1.9498 GiB/s]
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild

transfer/1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/mtu-1500

       time:   [50.359 ms 50.401 ms 50.445 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9359 GiB/s 1.9376 GiB/s 1.9392 GiB/s]
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe

transfer/1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/mtu-1500

       time:   [2.9410 ms 2.9431 ms 2.9450 ms]
       thrpt:  [339.56   B/s 339.78   B/s 340.02   B/s]
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
7 (7.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild

transfer/1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/mtu-1500

       time:   [67.844 ms 68.102 ms 68.365 ms]
       thrpt:  [146.27 Kelem/s 146.84 Kelem/s 147.40 Kelem/s]

streams-flow-controlled/walltime/1-streams/each-4194304-bytes

       time:   [10.644 ms 10.647 ms 10.650 ms]
       thrpt:  [375.60 MiB/s 375.71 MiB/s 375.81 MiB/s]
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild

streams-flow-controlled/walltime/10-streams/each-1048576-bytes

       time:   [28.494 ms 28.505 ms 28.516 ms]
       thrpt:  [350.69 MiB/s 350.82 MiB/s 350.95 MiB/s]
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild

streams/walltime/1-streams/each-1000-bytes

       time:   [131.70 µs 132.23 µs 132.91 µs]
       thrpt:  [7.1754 MiB/s 7.2121 MiB/s 7.2415 MiB/s]
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild

streams/walltime/1000-streams/each-1-bytes

       time:   [3.8840 ms 3.8961 ms 3.9077 ms]
       thrpt:  [249.90 KiB/s 250.65 KiB/s 251.43 KiB/s]

streams/walltime/1000-streams/each-1000-bytes

       time:   [12.615 ms 12.626 ms 12.638 ms]
       thrpt:  [75.463 MiB/s 75.530 MiB/s 75.597 MiB/s]

transfer/walltime/pacing-false/same-seed

       time:   [2.0314 ms 2.0330 ms 2.0348 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9198 GiB/s 1.9214 GiB/s 1.9229 GiB/s]

transfer/walltime/pacing-false/varying-seeds

       time:   [2.0156 ms 2.0167 ms 2.0179 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9358 GiB/s 1.9370 GiB/s 1.9380 GiB/s]

transfer/walltime/pacing-true/same-seed

       time:   [2.0122 ms 2.0135 ms 2.0150 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9386 GiB/s 1.9401 GiB/s 1.9412 GiB/s]

transfer/walltime/pacing-true/varying-seeds

       time:   [2.0094 ms 2.0109 ms 2.0129 ms]
       thrpt:  [1.9406 GiB/s 1.9425 GiB/s 1.9440 GiB/s]

Instructions per cycle

Criterion reported no significant timing changes.

All benchmarks

Benchmark	IPC before	IPC after	ΔIPC
streams/walltime/1000-streams/each-1000-bytes	2.95	2.92	-1.1%
streams-flow-controlled/walltime/10-streams/each-1048576-bytes	3.19	3.16	-0.8%
streams-flow-controlled/walltime/1-streams/each-4194304-bytes	3.01	3.03	+0.6%
transfer/walltime/pacing-false/varying-seeds	2.85	2.86	+0.6%
transfer/walltime/pacing-false/same-seed	2.86	2.85	-0.4%
transfer/walltime/pacing-true/varying-seeds	2.87	2.88	+0.3%
transfer/walltime/pacing-true/same-seed	2.87	2.86	-0.3%
streams/walltime/1-streams/each-1000-bytes	2.55	2.56	+0.3%
transfer/1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/mtu-1500	3.19	3.19	-0.2%
streams/walltime/1000-streams/each-1-bytes	3.27	3.28	+0.2%
transfer/1-conn/1-100mb-req (aka. Upload)/mtu-1500	3.18	3.18	+0.1%
transfer/1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/mtu-1500	3.22	3.22	+0.0%
transfer/1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/mtu-1500	2.24	2.24	+0.0%

Profiles for profiler.firefox.com (64)

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 3, 2026 03:08

jesup requested review from KershawChang, larseggert, martinthomson and mxinden as code owners October 3, 2026 03:08

This was referenced Oct 3, 2026

WebTransport: report the fate of outgoing datagrams via aggregate stats #3991

Merged

Add Connection::set_remote_max_streams to raise the incoming stream limit #4010

Open

WebTransport: add anticipatedConcurrentIncomingUni/BidirectionalStreams support #4011

Open

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of jesup October 3, 2026 03:09

View session

Copilot AI reviewed Oct 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 0989fca to 46d208c Compare October 6, 2026 05:22

jesup requested a review from omansfeld as a code owner October 6, 2026 05:22

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from f039ffc to 8b15031 Compare October 6, 2026 05:22

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 46d208c to 81c0a1c Compare October 12, 2026 15:06

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from 8b15031 to 3becb80 Compare October 12, 2026 15:06

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 81c0a1c to 06d84c1 Compare October 14, 2026 17:17

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from 3becb80 to 9201b51 Compare October 14, 2026 17:17

mxinden approved these changes Oct 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 06d84c1 to 3a436bb Compare October 16, 2026 12:07

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from 9201b51 to 85fd2d6 Compare October 16, 2026 12:07

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 3a436bb to b235f68 Compare October 16, 2026 14:51

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from 85fd2d6 to 09773fc Compare October 16, 2026 14:51

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from b235f68 to 1eebcea Compare October 16, 2026 16:07

Base automatically changed from users/jesup/report_datagrams to users/jesup/datagram_counting October 17, 2026 01:54

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/datagram_counting branch from 8acfbd3 to 93b5b24 Compare October 17, 2026 13:24

jesup changed the base branch from users/jesup/datagram_counting to users/jesup/report_datagrams October 17, 2026 13:25

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from 09773fc to c9d3c36 Compare October 17, 2026 13:39

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/report_datagrams branch from 62589ab to 6325866 Compare October 17, 2026 17:07

jesup force-pushed the users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity branch from c9d3c36 to 4c6d5b8 Compare October 17, 2026 17:07

jesup mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2026

WebTransport: report the fate of outgoing datagrams via aggregate stats #4091

Open

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

WebTransport: expose outgoing datagram queue capacity per session - #4037

WebTransport: expose outgoing datagram queue capacity per session#4037
jesup wants to merge 1 commit into
users/jesup/report_datagramsfrom
users/jesup/expose_queue_capacity

jesup commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

jesup commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

larseggert commented Oct 15, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Succeeded Interop Tests

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Conversation

jesup commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

jesup commented Oct 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will regress 2 benchmarks

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

larseggert commented Oct 15, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Failed Interop Tests

Succeeded Interop Tests

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Client/server transfer results

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Benchmark results

Instructions per cycle

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

jesup commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading